SolutionsFast migrations
Migration as a parallel run, not a leap
With a control layer in front of the stack, a SIEM migration becomes a parallel run plus a routing change: both platforms receive the same feed until the new one is proven, then the cutover is a percentage.
01The problem
What this actually fixes
A traditional migration is an all-or-nothing project: months of planning, parallel infrastructure, two platforms licensed at once, and the risk of a compliance gap if data stops flowing to the old system before the new one is ready. That is why migrations run long and why so many stall.
The question is not whether you will migrate someday. It is whether you can do it without disruption, and without paying two platforms for most of a year.
02The work
How the parallel run works
- Fork at the source and write to old and new platforms in parallel from one collection layer, with no duplicate forwarders.
- Transition source by source at your own pace, retiring old routes only when validation passes.
- Keep full fidelity in open-format storage throughout, so the compliance archive never has a gap.
- Cut over by adjusting routing percentages, with rollback available by the same mechanism.
What it leaves you with
The dual license window shrinks to the length of the parallel run, the old platform retires only when the new one has proven itself on live data, and the next migration is a routing change too.
03Read more
The journal pieces behind this
The longer read, with the sources on the page.
See your architecture drawn, with the costs, before you spend anything.
Our lead architects draw your SIEM feed from your diagrams: where the cost sits, what step one would change, and where it would not pay. If it pays, the next step is a two-week proof on your noisiest source.
Free. No system access. No obligation. You keep the drawing.
What you get
- Your architecture today, drawn
- The waste map
- Costs before and after, with estimates
- Your target architecture
- Options for your business problem
What it costsNothing